Very good job. Common Sense skeptic is a charlatan who has an axe to grind with Elon musk personally and therefore is extremely biased in all of the videos
Dec 28, 2021·edited Dec 28, 2021Liked by Little Blue NA
You completely overlooked one important fact! Starlink has no contract or cancellation fees. Viasat and HughesNet have both. I had HughesNet, it's not even in the same ballpark as Starlink.
So you skipped over the 3min introduction where CSS outlines how much of a scumbag Elon Musk is so that you can attack the "completely unsubstantiated claim" that people were just putting Dishy on the ground. WOW this is a groundbreaking takedown!!!
1. Who the f cares whether or not that claim was true? What the hell difference does it make?
2. They didn't even present it as an empirical claim. They just said "from the looks of it people are doing this..." Yet you attacked it as if it were an empirical claim.
Really bad start to this. Not bother to read the rest.
You said " Also notice that the article they link lists median speeds as high as 93.1 mbps for an entire county, "
Your source says this:
Starlink’s lowest median download speed was 40.4 Mbps in Columbia County, Oregon. Its highest median download speed was 93.1 Mbps in Shasta County, California
You either mis-read, or you bank on people not to fact check your facts...
Very good job. Common Sense skeptic is a charlatan who has an axe to grind with Elon musk personally and therefore is extremely biased in all of the videos
You completely overlooked one important fact! Starlink has no contract or cancellation fees. Viasat and HughesNet have both. I had HughesNet, it's not even in the same ballpark as Starlink.
So you skipped over the 3min introduction where CSS outlines how much of a scumbag Elon Musk is so that you can attack the "completely unsubstantiated claim" that people were just putting Dishy on the ground. WOW this is a groundbreaking takedown!!!
1. Who the f cares whether or not that claim was true? What the hell difference does it make?
2. They didn't even present it as an empirical claim. They just said "from the looks of it people are doing this..." Yet you attacked it as if it were an empirical claim.
Really bad start to this. Not bother to read the rest.
You said " Also notice that the article they link lists median speeds as high as 93.1 mbps for an entire county, "
Your source says this:
Starlink’s lowest median download speed was 40.4 Mbps in Columbia County, Oregon. Its highest median download speed was 93.1 Mbps in Shasta County, California
You either mis-read, or you bank on people not to fact check your facts...